Solutions that are comprised of high proportions of fear and power are usually more destructive than anything else.
Where spirituality includes sensitivity to what might be true, religion too often seems to assume it has exclusively found it.
Grasping anything is an attempt to make it finite.
Is it just me, or does the political electorate seem increasingly focused on single-threaded versions of issues with candidates, rather than on candidates who can most affectively relate to and deal with multi-threaded issues (so little of it seems to embrace needs of the collective, rather than simply one person’s experience)?
